You would have to remap in BIOS. Acer is pretty much ignoring any
requests for fixes for x64 compatibility fixes, but if you find
after flashing the new BIOS there is no support, you should still
contact them and add another voice/complaint.

On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 03:21:44 -0600, coljohnhannibalsmith
<coljohnhannibalsmith.2zq3g4@no-mx.forums.net> wrote:

>
>I already have KB929777 installed, and I have an ATI Graphics Card not
>an NVIDIA; but it does appear the error is ram related. It took me a
>while, but I finally figured out why you're leaning in this direction.
>The Card Reader was stable with Vista x32 only seeing 2GB ram. So,
>after recollecting the crash data I yanked the second memory stick and
>guess what. The Card Reader works rock solid in Vista x64. It's
>looking now like the Card Reader and the upper 2GB of ram are trying to
>share the same address space. I would have thought Device Manager would
>catch the conflict, but I guess not. I'm fairly certain my BIOS doesn't
>have a memory remapping feature; but this can be done in Device Manager
>can't it?
>
>BTW, I haven't flashed the BIOS chip with the new version yet; but I'll
>check for this feature as soon as I do.
>
>
>-John
--

Barb Bowman
MS Windows-MVP
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/e...ts/bowman.mspx
http://blogs.digitalmediaphile.com/barb/

so you're good with my workaround?

On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:46:00 -0600, coljohnhannibalsmith
<coljohnhannibalsmith.2zqr23@no-mx.forums.net> wrote:

>
>Barb Bowman;507241 Wrote:
>> You would have to remap in BIOS. Acer is pretty much ignoring any
>> requests for fixes for x64 compatibility fixes, but if you find
>> after flashing the new BIOS there is no support, you should still
>> contact them and add another voice/complaint.
>>
>> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 03:21:44 -0600, coljohnhannibalsmith
>> <coljohnhannibalsmith.2zq3g4@xxxxxx-mx.forums.net> wrote:
>>
>> --
>>
>> Barb Bowman
>> MS Windows-MVP
>> 'Previous Columns by Barb Bowman'
>> (http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/e...ts/bowman.mspx)
>> 'Barb's Connected World' (http://blogs.digitalmediaphile.com/barb/)
>
>
>Ah yes the BIOS,
>
>The BIOS has two versions a DOS version and a Windows version. The
>README file states that you can launch each version in its appropriate
>environment. When I tried to launch the Windows version, I got an "Error
>1275" stating:
>
>"The Driver could not be loaded."
>
>The text of the error message said to "check administrator privileges."
>Well I'm the administrator and I have User Account Control turned off
>and Data Execution Prevention in the default setting, which is to
>monitor Windows Services only NOT Programs; so this certainly isn't the
>cause.
>
>I then launched a DOS window and attempted to run both the Windows and
>the DOS versions of the installer. I received error messages both times.
>I believe when I tried to run the DOS version, I simply got a gereric
>error message stating an incompatibility issue. If my memory serves me
>correctly, when I tried to run the Windows version from the DOS window,
>I got an error message stating that the application is not compatible
>with 64 bit OSs. This makes sense, since Acer is trying their best, NOT
>to offer any x64 support. What I'm going to try next is to reinstall my
>old 100GB drive with Vista x32 on it and attempt to load the new BIOS
>from there. My last BIOS flash was done from XP x32.
>
>BTW, I checked Device Manager and it appears there's an option to
>modify resources; but it's greyed-out and it also appears greyed-out for
>other unrelated components in DM as well. I wonder what bedeviled MS to
>disable this feature and if there's any way to turn it back on? What
>knuckleheads! When you deliver an unfinished product to the public, you
>"DON'T" disable TS features.
>
>Oh, and Emma from MS wrote back again, she said she wanted me to send
>her the crash data and data from MSIFNO32, from after I performed the
>Clean Install, which makes sense; but then, she said we would "update
>the drivers one by one." This begs the questions: "Why would we need to
>update any drivers at all, especially more than one, since I'm getting
>BSODs immediately after install, before loading the SD Card Drivers;
>which means the only drivers being loaded are those supplied by the OS
>itself and when I get the SD Card BSODs, the only drivers loaded are
>those for the Memory Card Reader Plus the OS and I have the latest
>Memory Card Reader Drivers and she already knows that.
>
>I haven't told her I've TS'd the problem to the upper 2GB of ram yet;
>but I'm wondering if she'd even understand if I did.
>
>
>
>Weeeee...........:party:
--

Barb Bowman
MS Windows-MVP
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/e...ts/bowman.mspx
http://blogs.digitalmediaphile.com/barb/